Nigel Pearson wanted penalty for Lloyd Kelly challenge

NIGEL Pearson and Scott Parker introduced differing perspectives at the determination to not award Bristol City a penalty towards Cherries.

With Cherries 2-1 forward after targets from Dominic Solanke and Lewis Cook cancelled out Robert Atkinson’s opener, Chris Martin went down within the field underneath a problem from Lloyd Kelly.

Referee Stephen Martin waved away the penalty claims.

Cherries moved 3-1 up because of a Siriki Dembele strike, earlier than Andreas Weimann netted a past due comfort.

“You need a bit of a rub of the green,” mentioned Robins boss Pearson.

“We indisputably didn’t get that with the penalty determination.

“I’ve noticed it from a couple of angles. If we listen that time period once more ‘a natural coming together’, my interpretation of the regulation is defenders can’t contact a ahead from in the back of and make bodily touch, so it’s now not a coming in combination.

“Because Chris has touched the ball clear of him.

“We’ve had one penalty all season. We’ve had such a lot of selections pass towards us and it could be attention-grabbing to understand why.

“I couldn’t give you an answer to that. I can’t do anything about it I’m afraid and the officials aren’t publicly accountable.”

Asked whether or not he felt Solanke’s function must had been dominated out for offside, Pearson added: “I will’t see the purpose of commenting on stuff like that. I’ve noticed it and it’s tight, however there we pass.

“My aim isn’t to return in right here and make excuses.

“My intention is to try and recognise what was good and bad about the performance today. I thought we showed some good qualities, but make too many unforced errors in possession.”

Discussing Bristol City’s penalty shout, Cherries boss Parker mentioned: “I did not assume that used to be a penalty. I assumed he went down very, really easy.

“I’ve not seen it back, but from what I saw at the time, I didn’t think that was a penalty.”

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.